Stanford researcher says coronavirus isn’t as fatal as we thought


A Stanford statistician says COVID-19 isn’t as deadly as we thought — but his calculations in a new study are already under attack from critics who say it overlooks the actual body count.

In an analysis, Dr. John Ioannidis places the fatality rate between 0.02%-0.4%, far lower than the 1%-and-way-up numbers that were once bandied about – and much closer to the 0.1% death rate of the flu.

“While COVID-19 is a formidable threat, the fact that its IFR (infection fatality rate) is much lower than originally feared, is a welcome piece of evidence,” he wrote. “At a very broad, bird’s eye view level, worldwide the IFR of COVID-19 this season may be in the same ballpark as the IFR of influenza.”

The calculations don’t mean that the virus isn’t all that dangerous – because the number of lives lost due to COVID-19, even under tough shelter restrictions, dwarfs the number of deaths due to the flu.

Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology, has long argued that the lockdowns pose a bigger threat to public health than the COVID-19 virus. One of the authors of a pilloried Santa Clara County study, he has repeatedly questioned the prevailing wisdom of our current shelter-at-home strategy. US SPREAD GOOD NEWS!

I run this site in my spare time and thoroughly enjoy giving you all positive news!  If you’ve enjoyed the site we’d love for you to help me share the good news far and wide, share us on Reddit, your Facebook or your Twitter and spread a little positivity around.